Structure type | Evaporite Diapir |
Deformed/Undeformed | Deformed |
Geological Setting | Betic system, Pre-Betic cordillera |
Outcropping/buried | Outcropping |
Evaporite unit/s name | Keuper facies |
Evaporite unit/s age | Carnian-Rhaetian (Upper Triassic) |
Evaporite unit/s origin | Marine |
Classif. (Hudec and Jackson, 2009) | Passive piercement |
Classif. (Jackson and Talbot, 1986) | Salt wall |
Age of evaporite flow or deformation (when deformed) | Miocene |
Other comments | Bicorp-Quesa, Navarrés and Sellent salt wall segments constitute a continuous kinked salt wall of Middle to Upper Triassic evaporites, that crosses the central part of the Valencian domain. Miocene evolution divided into three major phases: initial extensional phase during which the graben system formed and the diapir rose; a second phase during which regional shortening closed the diapir; and a third phase characterized by normal faulting during which diapirism was reactivated (see Roca et al., 1996). |
Unique ID | 33 |
Name | Bicorp-Quesa |
Structure type | Evaporite diapir |
Deformed/Undeformed | Deformed |
Buried/Outcropping | Outcropping |
Geological setting | Betic System |
Geological Regional Setting | Prebetic Cordillera |
Evaporite unit/s name | Keuper facies |
Evaporite unit/s age | Carnian-Rhaetian (Upper Triassic) |
Evaporite unit/s era | Mesozoic |
Evaporite unit/s origin | Continental |
Evaporite unit/s composition | Gypsum-Marlstones-Sandstones-Halite-Anhydrite |
Post-kinematic unit/s (or post-evaporite units when evaporites are undeformed) | Quaternary (alluvial and colluvial detrital deposits) |
Post-kinematic unit/s age (or post-evaporite units when evaporites are undeformed) | Holocene |
Classification (Hudec and Jackson, 2009) | Passive piercement |
Classification (Jackson and Talbot, 1986) | Salt wall |
Mining activity? | N |
Mining activity start | |
Mining activity end | |
Mining galleries? | |
Mining products | |
Mining sub-products | |
Evaporite flow? | Y |
Age of evaporite flow | Aquitanian – Langhian (early stage) and Lower Tortonian (late stage) |
Flow or deformation triggering mechanisms | Extension: formation of a horsts and graben system (early stage) and normal reactivation of the major pre-existing contractional faults and thrust welds (late stage) |
Flow-linked structures? | Y |
Halokinetic structures | Normal high-angle faults / thrust faults / joints / thickness variations |
Post-evaporite and pre-kinematic unit/s (overbuden) | Jurassic (limestones and dolostones) / Albian-Aptian (marly dolostones and limestones) / Lower Cretaceous (dolostones and limestones) / Cenomanian-Turonian (marly dolostones, limestones and shales) / Senonian (limestones) / |
Syn-kinematic unit/s | Lower-Middle Miocene (red mudstones, conglomerates, and sandstones of alluvial origin, and minor lacustrine limestones) / early Tortonian (grey and red mudstones and sandstones overlain by a sequence of mudstones, limestones and dolostones) / upper Miocene (thin bedded limestones with abundant gastropods) / upper Miocene (alluvial conglomerates) |
Available seismic profiles | |
Available boreholes | ABRULLADOR / BARRANCO PELOTERO / GARROFERAL / BARRANCO DE AGUAS / FRIJOLET (BARRANCO FRIJOLET) / MONTECARLO / LAGOS / MANAL / CALDERON / BANCAL ROJO / CALDERON-II / CEMENTERIO / CORRAL BLANCO / RIO CAZUMA (BICORP) |
Additional comments | Bicorp-Quesa, Navarrés and Sellent salt wall segments constitute a continuous kinked salt wall of Middle to Upper Triassic evaporites, that crosses the central part of the Valencian domain. Miocene evolution divided into three major phases: initial extensional phase during which the graben system formed and the diapir rose; a second phase during which regional shortening closed the diapir; and a third phase characterized by normal faulting during which diapirism was reactivated (see Roca et al., 1996) |
UNIQUE_ID | 33 |
Minning exploitations within <2km? | N |
Historical/Active | |
Exploitation name #1 | |
Exploitation ID (Spanish National Mining Cadastre) #1 | |
Municipality #1 | |
Province #1 | |
Company #1 | |
Main minning Products #1 | |
Exploitation name #2 | |
Exploitation ID (Spanish National Mining Cadastre) #2 | |
Municipality #2 | |
Province #2 | |
Company #2 | |
Main minning Products #2 | |
Exploitation name #3 | |
Exploitation ID (Spanish National Mining Cadastre) #3 | |
Municipality #3 | |
Province #3 | |
Company #3 | |
Main minning Products #3 |
UNIQUE_ID | 33 |
Outcropping area (km2) | 18.84879 |
Horizontal intersection area (km2) (when buried) | Not buried |
Depth of intersection area (km2) (when buried) | Not buried |
Max. Width (Km) | 5.6 |
Max. Length (Km) | 17.1 |
Max. Evaporites thickness (km) | 2.5 |
Max. Deformation age (Ma) | 23 |
Min. Deformation age (Ma) | 10 |
Deformation stages | 2 |
UNIQUE_ID | 33 |
Section source | Rubinat, M., Ledo, J., Roca, E., Rosell, O., Queralt, P., 2010. Magnetotelluric characterization of a salt diapir: a case study on Bicorb–Quesa Diapir (Prebetic Zone, SE Spain). Journal of the Geological Society, 167(1), 145-153. [link] |
Well / Borehole availability #1 | Roca, E., Sans, M., Koyi, H. A., 2006. Polyphase deformation of diapiric areas in models and in the eastern Prebetics (Spain). AAPG bulletin, 90(1), 115-136. [link] |
Well / Borehole availability #2 | n.a. |
Available data (Stratigraphy) #1 | Ortí-Cabo, F., 1974. El Keuper del Levante español: litostratigrafía, petrología y paleogeografía de la cuenca [Ph.D. thesis]: Universitat de Barcelona, 267pp. [link] |
Available data (Stratigraphy) #2 | Rubinat-Cabanas, M., 2012. Basement fault influence on the Bicorb-Quesa Salt Wall kinematics, insights from Magnetotelluric and Paleomagnetic techniques on Salt Tectonics [Ph.D. thesis]: Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, 169pp. [link] |
Available data (Stratigraphy) #3 | Gagliardo, M., Piñol, F. C., Caselli, A., Tripaldi, A., Limarino, C. O., 2000. Evolución tectonosedimentaria de la cuenca Miocena de» Piggy-Back» de Rodeo-Iglesia (San Juan, Argentina). Geotemas (Madrid), (2), 77-79. [link] |
Available data (Stratigraphy) #4 | Santisteban, C., Ruíz-Sánchez, F., Bello, D., 1989. Los depósitos lacustres del Terciario de Bicorp (Valencia). Acta geológica hispánica, 24(3), 299-307. [link] |
Available data (Stratigraphy) #5 | Roca, E., Anadón, P., Utrilla, R., Vázquez, A., 1996. Rise, closure and reactivation of the Bicorb–Quesa evaporite diapir, eastern Prebetics, Spain. Journal of the Geological Society, 153(2), 311-321. [link] |
Available data (Stratigraphy) #6 | Arche, A., López-Gómez, J., García-Hidalgo, J. F., 2002. Control climático, tectónico y eustático en depósitos del Carniense (Triásico Superior) del SE de la Península Ibérica. Journal of Iberian Geology, 28, 13-30. [link] |
Regional Stratigraphy | Navarro-Carrasco, Ó., Meléndez-Hevia, I., 2020. Geology and evolution of the Cortes de Pallás diapir (Eastern Iberia). Journal of Maps, 16(2), 625-637. [link] |
Seismic data availability #1 | n.a. |
Seismic data availability #2 | n.a. |
Seismic data availability #3 | n.a. |
Available data (Structure) #1 | Roca, E., Anadón, P., Utrilla, R., Vázquez, A., 1996. Rise, closure and reactivation of the Bicorb–Quesa evaporite diapir, eastern Prebetics, Spain. Journal of the Geological Society, 153(2), 311-321. [link] |
Available data (Structure) #2 | Roca, E., Beamud, E., Rubinat, M., Soto, R., Ferrer, O., 2013. Paleomagnetic and inner diapiric structural constraints on the kinematic evolution of a salt-wall: The Bicorb-Quesa and northern Navarrés salt-wall segments case (Prebetic Zone, SE Iberia). Journal of Structural Geology, 52, 80-95. [link] |
Available data (Structure) #3 | Rubinat, M., Ledo, J., Roca, E., Rosell, O., Queralt, P., 2010. Magnetotelluric characterization of a salt diapir: a case study on Bicorb–Quesa Diapir (Prebetic Zone, SE Spain). Journal of the Geological Society, 167(1), 145-153. [link] |
Available data (Structure) #4 | Rubinat-Cabanas, M., 2012. Basement fault influence on the Bicorb-Quesa Salt Wall kinematics, insights from Magnetotelluric and Paleomagnetic techniques on Salt Tectonics [Ph.D. thesis]: Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, 169pp. [link] |
Available data (Structure) #5 | Roca, E., Sans, M., Koyi, H. A., 2006. Polyphase deformation of diapiric areas in models and in the eastern Prebetics (Spain). AAPG bulletin, 90(1), 115-136. [link] |
Available data (Structure) #6 | n.a. |
Available data (Analogue modelling) #1 | Roca, E., Sans, M., Koyi, H. A., 2006. Polyphase deformation of diapiric areas in models and in the eastern Prebetics (Spain). AAPG bulletin, 90(1), 115-136. [link] |
Available data (Analogue modelling) #2 | n.a. |
Available data (Analogue modelling) #3 | n.a. |
Available data (Gravimetry – Tomography) #1 | Rubinat-Cabanas, M., 2012. Basement fault influence on the Bicorb-Quesa Salt Wall kinematics, insights from Magnetotelluric and Paleomagnetic techniques on Salt Tectonics [Ph.D. thesis]: Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, 169pp. [link] |
Available data (Gravimetry – Tomography) #2 | n.a. |
Available data (Gravimetry – Tomography) #3 | n.a. |
Available data (Geochemistry) #1 | Cuairán, J. B., Inglès, M., Cabo, F. O., 1987. Observaciones sobre mineralogía y geoquímica de lutitas del Keuper de Valencia. Cuadernos de Geología Ibérica, 11, 363-384. [link] |
Available data (Geochemistry) #2 | Ortí, F., García-Veigas, J., Rossell, L., Jurado, M. J., Utrilla, R., 1996. Formaciones salinas de las cuencas triásicas en la Península Ibérica: Caracterización Petrológica y Geoquímica. Cuadernos de Geología Ibérica, 20, 13-35. [link] |
Available data (Geochemistry) #3 | n.a. |
Available data (Geochemistry) #4 | n.a. |
Available data (Petrophysics) #1 | Soto, R., Beamud, E., Oliva-Urcia, B., Roca, E., Rubinat, M., Villalaín, J. J., 2014. Applicability of magnetic fabrics in rocks associated with the emplacement of salt structures (the Bicorb–Quesa and Navarrés salt walls, Prebetics, SE Spain). Tectonophysics, 629, 319-334. [link] |
Available data (Petrophysics) #2 | Roca, E., Beamud, E., Rubinat, M., Soto, R., Ferrer, O., 2013. Paleomagnetic and inner diapiric structural constraints on the kinematic evolution of a salt-wall: The Bicorb-Quesa and northern Navarrés salt-wall segments case (Prebetic Zone, SE Iberia). Journal of Structural Geology, 52, 80-95. [link] |
IGME Geological Map (MAGNA50) Sheet number | 769-Navarres. [link] |
Other Maps #1 (source) | Escosa, F. O., Ferrer, O., Roca, E., 2018. Geology of the Eastern Prebetic Zone at the Jumilla region (SE Iberia). Journal of Maps, 14(2), 77-86. [link] |
Other Maps #2 (source) | Rubinat-Cabanas, M., 2012. Basement fault influence on the Bicorb-Quesa Salt Wall kinematics, insights from Magnetotelluric and Paleomagnetic techniques on Salt Tectonics [Ph.D. thesis]: Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, 169pp. [link] |
Other related references #1 | Ortí-Cabo, F., 1974. El Keuper del Levante español. Estudios Geológicos, 30. [link] |
Other related references #2 | Escosa, F. O., Roca, E., 2016. The external eastern prebetics: Paper of basement faults in an inverted salt-bearing passive margin. In International Conference and Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, 3-6 April 2016 (pp. 273-273). Society of Exploration Geophysicists and American Association of Petroleum Geologists. [link] |
Other related references #3 | Escosa, F. O., 2019. Extensional development and contractional reactivation of salt walls: examples from the southeastern Paradox Basin (SW Colorado) and the Eastern Prebetic Zone (SE Spain) [Ph.D. thesis]: Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, 249pp. [link] |
Other related references #4 | Martín-Chivelet, J., López-Gómez, J., Aguado, R., Arias, C., Arribas, J., Arribas, M. E., … , Casas-Sainz, A., 2019. The Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Rifting. In (Quesada C., Oliveira J., eds.): The Geology of Iberia: A Geodynamic Approach. Regional Geology Reviews. Springer, Cham. [link] |
UNIQUE_ID | 33 |
Seismic survey name #1 | |
Across structure? #1 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #1 | |
Seismic profile code #1 | |
Seismic profile name #1 | |
Seismic survey year #1 | |
Data repository #1 | |
Length (km) #1 | |
Seismic survey name #2 | |
Across structure? #2 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #2 | |
Seismic profile code #2 | |
Seismic profile name #2 | |
Seismic survey year #2 | |
Data repository #2 | |
Length (km) #2 | |
Seismic survey name #3 | |
Across structure? #3 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #3 | |
Seismic profile code #3 | |
Seismic profile name #3 | |
Seismic survey year #3 | |
Data repository #3 | |
Length (km) #3 | |
Seismic survey name #4 | |
Across structure? #4 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #4 | |
Seismic profile code #4 | |
Seismic profile name #4 | |
Seismic survey year #4 | |
Data repository #4 | |
Length (km) #4 | |
Seismic survey name #5 | |
Across structure? #5 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #5 | |
Seismic profile code #5 | |
Seismic profile name #5 | |
Seismic survey year #5 | |
Data repository #5 | |
Length (km) #5 | |
Seismic survey name #6 | |
Across structure? #6 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #6 | |
Seismic profile code #6 | |
Seismic profile name #6 | |
Seismic survey year #6 | |
Data repository #6 | |
Length (km) #6 | |
Seismic survey name #7 | |
Across structure? #7 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #7 | |
Seismic profile code #7 | |
Seismic profile name #7 | |
Seismic survey year #7 | |
Data repository #7 | |
Length (km) #7 | |
Seismic survey name #8 | |
Across structure? #8 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #8 | |
Seismic profile code #8 | |
Seismic profile name #8 | |
Seismic survey year #8 | |
Data repository #8 | |
Length (km) #8 | |
Seismic survey name #9 | |
Across structure? #9 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #9 | |
Seismic profile code #9 | |
Seismic profile name #9 | |
Seismic survey year #9 | |
Data repository #9 | |
Length (km) #9 | |
Seismic survey name #10 | |
Across structure? #10 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #10 | |
Seismic profile code #10 | |
Seismic profile name #10 | |
Seismic survey year #10 | |
Data repository #10 | |
Length (km) #10 | |
Seismic survey name #11 | |
Across structure? #11 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #11 | |
Seismic profile code #11 | |
Seismic profile name #11 | |
Seismic survey year #11 | |
Data repository #11 | |
Length (km) #11 | |
Seismic survey name #12 | |
Across structure? #12 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #12 | |
Seismic profile code #12 | |
Seismic profile name #12 | |
Seismic survey year #12 | |
Data repository #12 | |
Length (km) #12 | |
Seismic survey name #13 | |
Across structure? #13 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #13 | |
Seismic profile code #13 | |
Seismic profile name #13 | |
Seismic survey year #13 | |
Data repository #13 | |
Length (km) #13 | |
Seismic survey name #14 | |
Across structure? #14 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #14 | |
Seismic profile code #14 | |
Seismic profile name #14 | |
Seismic survey year #14 | |
Data repository #14 | |
Length (km) #14 | |
Seismic survey name #15 | |
Across structure? #15 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #15 | |
Seismic profile code #15 | |
Seismic profile name #15 | |
Seismic survey year #15 | |
Data repository #15 | |
Length (km) #15 | |
Seismic survey name #16 | |
Across structure? #16 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #16 | |
Seismic profile code #16 | |
Seismic profile name #16 | |
Seismic survey year #16 | |
Data repository #16 | |
Length (km) #16 | |
Seismic survey name #17 | |
Across structure? #17 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #17 | |
Seismic profile code #17 | |
Seismic profile name #17 | |
Seismic survey year #17 | |
Data repository #17 | |
Length (km) #17 | |
Seismic survey name #18 | |
Across structure? #18 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #18 | |
Seismic profile code #18 | |
Seismic profile name #18 | |
Seismic survey year #18 | |
Data repository #18 | |
Length (km) #18 | |
Seismic survey name #19 | |
Across structure? #19 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #19 | |
Seismic profile code #19 | |
Seismic profile name #19 | |
Seismic survey year #19 | |
Data repository #19 | |
Length (km) #19 | |
Seismic survey name #20 | |
Across structure? #20 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #20 | |
Seismic profile code #20 | |
Seismic profile name #20 | |
Seismic survey year #20 | |
Data repository #20 | |
Length (km) #20 | |
Seismic survey name #21 | |
Across structure? #21 | |
Seismic profile ID (IGME) #21 | |
Seismic profile code #21 | |
Seismic profile name #21 | |
Seismic survey year #21 | |
Data repository #21 | |
Length (km) #21 | |
Borehole name #1 | ABRULLADOR |
Company #1 | TRAGSA |
Traget #1 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #1 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #2 | BARRANCO PELOTERO |
Company #2 | TRAGSA |
Traget #2 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #2 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #3 | GARROFERAL |
Company #3 | TRAGSA |
Traget #3 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #3 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #4 | BARRANCO DE AGUAS |
Company #4 | TRAGSA |
Traget #4 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #4 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #5 | FRIJOLET (BARRANCO FRIJOLET) |
Company #5 | TRAGSA |
Traget #5 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #5 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #6 | MONTECARLO |
Company #6 | TRAGSA |
Traget #6 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #6 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #7 | LAGOS |
Company #7 | TRAGSA |
Traget #7 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #7 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #8 | MANAL |
Company #8 | TRAGSA |
Traget #8 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #8 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #9 | CALDERON |
Company #9 | TRAGSA |
Traget #9 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #9 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #10 | BANCAL ROJO |
Company #10 | TRAGSA |
Traget #10 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #10 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #11 | CALDERON-II |
Company #11 | TRAGSA |
Traget #11 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #11 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #12 | CEMENTERIO |
Company #12 | TRAGSA |
Traget #12 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #12 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #13 | CORRAL BLANCO |
Company #13 | TRAGSA |
Traget #13 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #13 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #14 | RIO CAZUMA (BICORP) |
Company #14 | TRAGSA |
Traget #14 | HYDROGEOLOGY |
Across structure? #14 | N (within 5 km) |
Borehole name #15 | |
Company #15 | |
Traget #15 | |
Across structure? #15 |
UNIQUE_ID | 33 |
X Centroid (Structure shape) | -0.766925 |
Y Centroid (Structure shape) | -0.766925 |
Xmin (Structure shape) | -0.862132 |
Xmax (Structure shape) | -0.664683 |
Ymin (Structure shape) | 39.084007 |
Ymax (Structure shape) | 39.138623 |
Xmin seismic line #1 | |
Xmax seismic line #1 | |
Ymin seismic line #1 | |
Ymax seismic line #1 | |
Xmin seismic line #2 | |
Xmax seismic line #2 | |
Ymin seismic line #2 | |
Ymax seismic line #2 | |
Xmin seismic line #3 | |
Xmax seismic line #3 | |
Ymin seismic line #3 | |
Ymax seismic line #3 | |
Xmin seismic line #4 | |
Xmax seismic line #4 | |
Ymin seismic line #4 | |
Ymax seismic line #4 | |
Xmin seismic line #5 | |
Xmax seismic line #5 | |
Ymin seismic line #5 | |
Ymax seismic line #5 | |
Xmin seismic line #6 | |
Xmax seismic line #6 | |
Ymin seismic line #6 | |
Ymax seismic line #6 | |
Xmin seismic line #7 | |
Xmax seismic line #7 | |
Ymin seismic line #7 | |
Ymax seismic line #7 | |
Xmin seismic line #8 | |
Xmax seismic line #8 | |
Ymin seismic line #8 | |
Ymax seismic line #8 | |
Xmin seismic line #9 | |
Xmax seismic line #9 | |
Ymin seismic line #9 | |
Ymax seismic line #9 | |
Xmin seismic line #10 | |
Xmax seismic line #10 | |
Ymin seismic line #10 | |
Ymax seismic line #10 | |
Xmin seismic line #11 | |
Xmax seismic line #11 | |
Ymin seismic line #11 | |
Ymax seismic line #11 | |
Xmin seismic line #12 | |
Xmax seismic line #12 | |
Ymin seismic line #12 | |
Ymax seismic line #12 | |
Xmin seismic line #13 | |
Xmax seismic line #13 | |
Ymin seismic line #13 | |
Ymax seismic line #13 | |
Xmin seismic line #14 | |
Xmax seismic line #14 | |
Ymin seismic line #14 | |
Ymax seismic line #14 | |
Xmin seismic line #15 | |
Xmax seismic line #15 | |
Ymin seismic line #15 | |
Ymax seismic line #15 | |
Xmin seismic line #16 | |
Xmax seismic line #16 | |
Ymin seismic line #16 | |
Ymax seismic line #16 | |
Xmin seismic line #17 | |
Xmax seismic line #17 | |
Ymin seismic line #17 | |
Ymax seismic line #17 | |
Xmin seismic line #18 | |
Xmax seismic line #18 | |
Ymin seismic line #18 | |
Ymax seismic line #18 | |
Xmin seismic line #19 | |
Xmax seismic line #19 | |
Ymin seismic line #19 | |
Ymax seismic line #19 | |
Xmin seismic line #20 | |
Xmax seismic line #20 | |
Ymin seismic line #20 | |
Ymax seismic line #20 | |
Xmin seismic line #21 | |
Xmax seismic line #21 | |
Ymin seismic line #21 | |
Ymax seismic line #21 | |
X borehole #1 | -0.676250 |
Y borehole #1 | 39.045541 |
X borehole #2 | -0.707672 |
Y borehole #2 | 39.092113 |
X borehole #3 | -0.640999 |
Y borehole #3 | 39.122226 |
X borehole #4 | -0.703176 |
Y borehole #4 | 39.141577 |
X borehole #5 | -0.720442 |
Y borehole #5 | 39.118131 |
X borehole #6 | -0.617655 |
Y borehole #6 | 39.087307 |
X borehole #7 | -0.782290 |
Y borehole #7 | 39.090673 |
X borehole #8 | -0.774601 |
Y borehole #8 | 39.141036 |
X borehole #9 | -0.678056 |
Y borehole #9 | 39.043324 |
X borehole #10 | -0.713410 |
Y borehole #10 | 39.075557 |
X borehole #11 | -0.676887 |
Y borehole #11 | 39.043752 |
X borehole #12 | -0.739797 |
Y borehole #12 | 39.117967 |
X borehole #13 | -0.795214 |
Y borehole #13 | 39.132994 |
X borehole #14 | -0.812109 |
Y borehole #14 | 39.115654 |
X borehole #15 | |
Y borehole #15 |